Forgejo vs Gitea
Forgejo and Gitea side by side, using the facts we store for each app. Where a value is missing, we have no data for it.
| Fact | Forgejo | Gitea |
|---|---|---|
| Description | A lightweight software forge focused on scaling, federation, and privacy (fork of Gitea). | A self-hosted Git service for managing repositories, issues, pull requests, and related collaboration workflows. |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| GitHub stars | 5,616 | 58,420 |
| Last repository update | Not available | Oct 11, 2026 |
| Runtime / stack | Docker, Go | Go, Docker, K8S |
| Install methods | Not available | source, binary |
| Container deployment | No container deployment found | Dockerfile only |
| Topic tags | Dev Project Management, Ticketing Systems, Wikis, Self Hosting Solutions | Dev Project Management, Automation Tools, Self Hosting Solutions |
| Alternative to | Bitbucket, GitHub | GitHub, Bitbucket |
| More | Forgejo on selfhostedworld.com | Gitea on selfhostedworld.com |
What they share
- Both use the MIT license.
- Both are tagged Dev Project Management and Self Hosting Solutions.
Where they differ
- Gitea has more GitHub stars than Forgejo: 58,420 against 5,616.
- Forgejo has no repository update date in our data.
- Only Forgejo is tagged Ticketing Systems and Wikis.
- Only Gitea is tagged Automation Tools.